Revathi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fifth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5916 of 2016 1 REVATHI 2 V. RADHAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A2 & A3 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTI WEST POLICE STATION, KOVILPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 240 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.PON SENTHIL KUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.240 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(B), 323, 420 and 506(i) of I.P.C., the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

3. On reading of the complaint, it is seen that in the year 2011, the de-facto complainant appears to have the financial dealings with Ramasethu, who is the father of the first petitioner Revathi and the second petitioner is the husband of Revathi.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations in the F.I.R., this Court is of the view that this is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 05/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,KOVILPATTI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTI WEST POLICE STATION, KOVILPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.PON SENTHIL KUMARAN Advocate SR.No.19329

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5916 of 2016 Date :05/04/2016 AA/AN-MP/AR-I/12.04.2016/2p-6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/