← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5973/2016ordered

M. Alangaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-04-06Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.04.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5973 of 2016

1. M.Alangaraj

2. Manikandan

3. Mahendran

4. Boobathi

5. Karthick

6. Ragavendran

7. Vishnu ... Petitioners / Accused No.1to7 Vs.

The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Mayanoor Police Station, Karur District.

Crime No.94 of 2016.

... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karur to consider the bail application of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 7 to be filed in Cr.No. 94 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of surrender on merits and thus render justice.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sivabalan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karur to consider the bail application of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 7 to be filed in Cr.No.94 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of surrender on merits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners also submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case for the

alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 r/w. Section 3(1)(r) and (s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioners cannot move any anticipatory bail application and therefore, the petitioners have come forward with the said prayer.

3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. Considering the submissions of both sides and also considering the nature of the prayer in this case in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that the petitioners cannot move any anticipatory bail, the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karur is directed to consider the bail application, in the event of the petitioners filing such petition in Crime No.94 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law on the same day.

With this observation, this petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karur.

2. The Inspector of Police, Mayanoor Police Station, Karur District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.Sivabalan, Advocate in SR.No. 19934 akv JAM/07.04.2016/JGB-DP/SAR-I/2P-5C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5973 of 2016 06.04.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/