Hemalatha v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Nineteenth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.10680 of 2018 1 HEMALATHA 2 JAYAKUMAR 3 INDIRA 4 SARATH 5 SHANTHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANKS NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGAMALAI PUDUKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

CRIME NO.325 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: Mr.S.MAHENDRAPATHY, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 365, 342, 294(b), 387, 506(ii), 397, 364-A, 465, 468, 471 I.P.C r/w Section 66-C, 72 of Information Technology Act, in Crime No.325 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

3.This Court granted interim relief with the hope that the amount which was forcibly taken from the victim would be returned. But, that has not happened so far. Since the allegations made against the petitioners are grave in nature, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 4.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 19/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGAMALAI PUDUKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10680 of 2018 Date :19/07/2018 MS/MMS/SAR-2/30.07.2018/2P.3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/