Muniyasamy v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/04/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Muniyasamy ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Parthipanoor Police Station Ramanathapuram District.
Cr.No.172/2022.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. R.Babu Jaganath, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 172/2022 on the file of the Respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A3, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.172 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the parties with regard to playing song in the temple festival, at that time the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant with iron rod and deadly weapons and also caused injuries. Hence the complaint.
3. Heard both side and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report. 1/3
4. This is the second application for anticipatory bail and earlier the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 17.10.2022 and since he is unable to execute sureties, the present petition has been filed. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner , with certain conditions:
5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am.,until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 17/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / 21/04/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
AAV 2/3
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARTHIPANOOR POLICE STATION RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.R.BABU JAGANATH, Advocate (SR-6010[I] dated 18/04/2023 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.6839 of 2023 Date :17/04/2023 RK/CG/SAR-4(21/04/2023) 3P/6C 3/3