← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6293/2016disposed of

Chinnamaila @ Kalaimoni v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-04-18Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.04.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6293 of 2016

1. Chinnamaila @ Kalaimoni

2. Petharamasamy 3.Ganagaraj ... Petitioners Vs.

The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

Crime No.139 of 2016.

(Amended as per the order of this Court by PNPJ on 18.04.2016 made in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.3313 of 2016 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6293 of 2016) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul to consider the bail application of the petitioners in Crime No.139 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul to consider the bail application of the petitioners in Crime No.139 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners also submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 of I.P.C., r/w. Section 3(1)(10) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioners cannot move any anticipatory bail application and therefore, the petitioners have come forward with the said prayer.

3. Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side).

4. Considering the submissions of both sides and also considering the nature of the prayer in this case in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that the petitioners cannot move any anticipatory bail, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul is directed to consider the bail application, in the event of the petitioners filing such petition in Crime No.139 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2016 on the file of the respondent police, and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law on the same day. With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/S.C.S.Herold Singh, Advocate in SR.No.21767 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6293 of 2016 18.04.2016 akv PA/SK-SKN/AR I/25.04.2016/2P/5C(IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/