Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20726/2015dismissed as infructuous

S. Palanichamy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2017-08-08Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.20726 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 S.Palanichamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Department of Local Authorities, St.George Fort, Chennai.

2.The Chairman, Sivakasi Municipality, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipality, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

4.Aasaikani 5.K.Pitchaikani 6.Sree Palani Constructions, Rep. By its Proprietor, Perumal,S/o.Palani 7.K.Paul Raj 8.M.Nagarajan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent Ordinary Meeting No.83, dated 26.10.2015, Resolutions Serial Nos.39, 60, 61, 62, 63 and 64 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and against the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 and its Rules, 2000 and further direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to allot the disputed tenders in favour of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Anantha Murugan For Respondent : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Government Advocate for R.1 Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohaideen, Additional Government Pleader for R.2 and R.3 Mr.M.P.Senthil for R.4 and R.5 No appearance for R.6 to R.8 ***** https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order of the second respondent Ordinary Meeting No.83, dated 26.10.2015, Resolutions Serial Nos.39, 60, 61, 62, 63 & 64 and to direct the second and third respondents to allot the disputed tenders in favour of the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. There is no representation for respondents 6 to 8.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is reported by the learned counsel on either side that the prayer sought for, in this writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication.

4. In view of the above submissions, no further order is required to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Record) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Local Authorities, St.George Fort, Chennai.

2.The Chairman, Sivakasi Municipality, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipality, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

+1cc to Mr.T.S.MOHAMED MOHAIDEEN, Advocate in SR. NO.71136 +1cc to Mr.M.P.SENTHIL Advocate in SR. No.71779 +1cc to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in SR. No.71684 GK JS/KP/SAR.1/22.08.2017/ 2P-7C W.P(MD)No.20726 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 08.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/