Prabu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.6374 of 2016 1 PRABU 2 CHITHRAIVELU 3 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CSCID VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, CR NO. 92 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.MUTHUKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 6(4) TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w 7(1)(a(ii) of EC Act 1955, in Crime No.92 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused were found in possession of 6 bags of PDS rice in an standing vehicle bearing registration No.TN36-B-5589.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they are not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent has submitted that the alleged 6 bags of PDS rice were recovered, which was wrongly loaded in the godown to the ration shop. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. The respondent police is at liberty to secure the petitioners in the event of non-compliance of the the above conditions.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 21/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II RAMANATHAPURAM.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CSCID VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.MUTHUKUMAR Advocate SR.No.22813

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6374 of 2016 Date :21/04/2016 PA/JGB-DP/SAR I/25.04.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/