Srinath v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15/04/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Srinath, ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Nadukaveri Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No. 62 of 2025).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Mahendrarajan B., Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 62 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-Police. 1/7

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 28.03.2025 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent-Police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 in Crime No.62 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 13.02.2025, the defacto complainant found that 5 HP Oil Engine was stolen from his farm land. On enquiry with the adjacent land owner, he came to know that the neighbour has also lost his oil engine. Therefore, the defacto complainant has lodged the complaint. When the respondent-police was on patrol duty, they noticed that the petitioner and other accused persons were transporting the oil engines, which have been stolen, in TATA Ace, bearing registration No.TN68-A-0275. The petitioner has have been arrayed as A1. Hence, this case.

2/7

4. Mr.B.Mahendrarajan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has no previous case. He however submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of prearrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Mr.S.S.Manoj, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent-Police, submits that totally, five accused persons were involved in this case and the property, which is worth about Rs.30,000/-, was not recovered. He further submits that if this Court grants pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, he will commit similar type of offence and cause threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses. However, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. The petitioner has permanent residence and hence, there is less possibility of absconding. Considering the same and also considering the facts and 3/7

circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence alleged against the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner is a first offender and with a view to give an opportunity to the petitioner to reform himself, this Court is inclined to grant an order of prearrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District;

(ii) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of Crime No.62 of 2025, before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District. In turn, the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District is directed to deposit the same, in any nationalised bank in an interest-bearing Fixed Deposit, initially for a period of one year, and renew them, till the conclusion of the case; The Court shall decide the entitlement qua deposit at the time of his final order/Judgment; (iii) Thereafter, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondentPolice weekly once i.e., on every Monday at 10.00 a.m., until further orders; 4/7

(iv) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity; (v) The petitioners shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District; (vi) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(vii) The petitioner shall not enter into the house or farm or work place of the defacto complainant;

(viii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (ix) The petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court;

(x) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence; and (xi) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District, or Trial Court as the case may be, is 5/7

entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by him as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

sd/- 15/04/2025 / TRUE COPY / /05/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I/ II /III/ IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

vsg TO 1.THE LEARNED JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVAIYARU, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT @ KUMBAKONAM.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADUKAVERI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

6/7

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6032 of 2025 Date :15/04/2025 VN/16.05.2025 7P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 7/7