← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9312/2024disposed of

Suresh R v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-04-09Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.04.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD) No.9312 of 2024 R. Suresh ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodinaickanur, Theni District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Bodinaickanur Town Police Station, Theni District.

4. Nirmala

5. Sethuraman ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents no.1 to 3 to provide police protection for running the petitioner's Suresh Impacks Trust activities peacefully situated at Subburaj Nagar, Bodinaickanur post and Taluk, Theni District situated at based on his representation dated 27.03.2024. Page No.1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Muthamil Venthan For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R4 : Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Isaac Paul

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents no.1 to 3 to provide police protection for running the petitioner's Suresh Impacks Trust activities based on his representation dated 27.03.2024.

2. According to the petitioner, he sent a representation dated 27.03.2025 for police protection to the 3rd respondent, but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.4 and 5 would submit that the petitioner is the tenant under the private respondents. The 4th respondent is aged about 80 years and 5th respondent is a bank official. While so, the petitioner without paying rent and in order to evade from payment of rent, has filed this petition for police protection. Therefore, the petitioner's representation cannot be Page No.2/4

considered.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents no.1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner is under enquiry and they will conduct enquiry and dispose of the same within one week.

5. Considering the prayer sought for in the petition and the representation of the petitioner is also pending with the 3rd respondent, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 27.03.2025 and dispose of the same in accordance with law after affording an opportunity to both the parties within a period of one week from the date of this order.

6. With the above said observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

09.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Mac Page No.3/4

P.DHANABAL , J.

Mac To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodinaickanur, Theni District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Bodinaickanur Town Police Station, Theni District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

09.04.2025 Page No.4/4