← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/350/2019dismissed

V.Ilayaraja, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2023-10-05Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr Justice V. Lakshminarayanan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.10.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P.(MD).No.2946 of 2019 V.Ilayaraja .. Appellant/Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by it's the Principal Secretary to Government, Home (Police) Department, Secretariat, 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board, No.807, 2nd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai.

3.The Director General of Police, O/o. Director General of Police,

4.The Additional Director General of Police, O/o. The Additional Director General of Police, 5.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

.. Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P.(MD).No.14773 of 2018 dated 10.07.2018 on the file of this Court.

For Appellant : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The order under challenge before us reveals that after hearing both sides, a direction was issued to the Additional Director General of Police to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner dated 25.06.2018, by taking into account that the Juvenile Justice Board,

Ramanathapuram had already acquitted the writ petitioner and the same has been recorded in the proceedings dated 03.02.2017 and accordingly, to pass orders on the said request of the writ petitioner seeking appointment, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The said order passed by the learned Single Judge cannot be construed as an order passed against the interest of the appellant, but a direction was issued to consider the case of the appellant.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant also made a submission that they are not interested in pursuing the appeal. Thus, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. If at all any grievance exists to the appellant, he is at liberty to redress the same in the manner known to law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.) 05.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm

To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police) Department, Secretariat, 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board, No.807, 2nd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai.

3.The Director General of Police, O/o. Director General of Police, 4.The Additional Director General of Police, O/o. The Additional Director General of Police, 5.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

Lm 05.10.2023