← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7248/2021allowed

Duraisamy @ Surya v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-06-04Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/06/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Duraisamy @ Surya ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Alwarkurichi Police Station, Tenkasi District (Cr.No.91 of 2021).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Ramachandran.S.R.A., Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanickam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.91 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.03.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections Girl Missing @ 366(A), 376 IPC, Section 9,10 of Child Marriage Act 2006 and Section 6,5(l) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in crime No.91 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner on false promise of marrying the victim had kidnapped her, sexually assaulted her and thereafter refused to marry her. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that A3 and A4 were released on bail by the learned Special Judge, Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Tirunelveli and A2 was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 1/3

20.05.2021 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.6714 of 2021. He would also submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 26.03.2021, hence he may be granted bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that there are totally four accused in this case and the petitioner herein is arrayed as A1. He would also submit that other accused in this case were granted bail and anticipatory bail. He would further submit that investigation is in preliminary stage and confession of the accused is also recorded.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that co- accused were granted bail and anticipatory bail and also the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing his own bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) before the Jail Authority. The petitioner after his release shall surrender before the concerned Judicial Magistrate voluntarily on any working day within a period of one month from the date of resumption of regular work in the Subordinate Courts and execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Tirunelveli.

i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity (ii) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to the credit of Government of Tamil Nadu, CMPRF in IOB, Secretariat Branch, Chennai-9 (Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFSC Code: IOBA0001172), within a period of two weeks without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court;

iii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

iv)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness. v)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial. vi)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned 2/3

Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. vii)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 04/06/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT FOR POCSO ACT CASES, TIRUNELVELI.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALWARKURICHI POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO:

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, CHIEF MINISTER PUBLIC RELIEF FUND IN IOB, SECRETARIAT BRANCH, CHENNAI-9.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7248 of 2021 Date :04/06/2021 AAV JM/VR/SAR I/04.06.2021/3P/6C 3/3