← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6609/2016allowed

Pranseh, S/O. Paraman, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-04-25Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.6609 of 2016 PRANSEH ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDALUR NORTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

CR.NO.103 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.THAMBIDURAI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC, in Crime No.103 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused had entered into the upstairs portion of the de-facto complainant's house and stolen Akai Tap Recorder and a Nokia Cell phone and when the de-facto complainant raised voice, the petitioner has thrown away the stolen articles and escape from the occurrence place.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. The respondent police is at liberty to secure the petitioner in the event of non-compliance of the above conditions. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 25/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDALUR NORTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S P.THAMBIDURAI Advocate SR.No.23196.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6609 of 2016 Date :25/04/2016 AM/NGM.SS/SAR-I/03.05.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/