Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1125/2017disposed of

State Of Tamilnadu v. K.M. Chandra

2017-08-28Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan,Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of July Two Thousand and Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.K.SASIDHARAN and The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN HCP(MD) No.1125 of 2017 (In the matter of production of detenue namely Baskar, aged about 36 years, son of Rabel, who is the son of the petitioner herein under, Article 226 of the Constitution of India) R.INNASIYAMMAL ... PETITIONER Vs 1 THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

... RESPONDENTS To 1 THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(R1) 2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.

(R2) 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

(R3) (With copies of petition and affidavit for each) Thro'

1.The Registrar General, High Court, Chennai. Reg R2 2.The Principal District Judge, Dindigul District. Reg R1 3.The Principal District Judge, Madurai District. Reg R3 (In duplicate, with copies for immediate service and return with covering letter) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

WHEREAS upon motion this day made unto this Court by MR.A.CHANDRAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and the petitioner praying this Court to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the detention order passed by the second respondent in detention Order No.38/2017 dated 23.05.2017 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the son of the petitioner namely Baskar, aged about 36 years,son of Rabel, now detained at Central Prison, Madurai before this Honourable Court and set him at liberty.

WHEREAS this Court hath directed issue of notice, returnable by Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of August, Two Thousand and Seventeen (28.08.2017) to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to show cause why this petition should not be complied with.

Now take notice that you, namely, 1 THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

the respondents 1 to 3 herein are hereby directed to appear in person or by Advocate before this MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI at 10.30 a.m. on Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of August, Two Thousand and Seventeen(28.08.2017) to show cause why this petition should not be complied with.

HEREIN FAIL NOT.

WITNESS the Honourable Ms.INDIRA BANERJEE, The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, this Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of July, Two Thousand and Seventeen(28.07.2017) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-III) ORDER DATED : 28.07.2017 HEARING DATE : 28.08.2017 NOTICE https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ HCP(MD)NO.1125 OF 2017 VB/KP/02/08/2017/2P/7C