S.Abdul Lateef v. The District Revenue Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.04.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA 1.S.Abdul Lateef 2.Mohammed Abdullah .. Petitioners Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the D.R.O., Collectorate, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Office of Collectorate, Trichy.

3.The Tahsildar, Office of Thiruvarambur Taluk Office, Thriuvarabur Post, Trichy District.

.. Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass order in my representation dated 26.12.2019 based on the proceedings of the 1st respondent made in Na.Ka.AA6-17810-2018 dated 21.05.2018 and the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated

20.01.2020 in connection with patta for the petitioner's land to an extent of 6 acres in Survey Nos.51, 52/2, 52/3 and 52/4 of Kumbagudi Velayadhagudi Village, Thiruverambur Taluk, Trichy District. For Petitioners :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.A.Sivanupandian Government Advocate

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 29.03.2023, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today (24.04.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 24.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr

To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the D.R.O., Collectorate, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Office of Collectorate, Trichy.

3.The Tahsildar, Office of Thiruvarambur Taluk Office, Thriuvarabur Post, Trichy District.

P.T.ASHA, J.

abr Dated: 24.04.2023