← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21445/2015disposed of

Syda Mohammed, v. The District Collector,

2015-12-02Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.12.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.21445 of 2015 Syda Mohammed ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sri Rengan Revenue Division, Navalar Kuttapattu, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to direct the third respondent to issue separate patta to the petitioner and fix the boundary marks of Punja survey Nos. 349/1B, 349/2A1, 349/3, 349/1A and Nanja Survey No. 349/5B2 situtated in Puthanatham Village, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.10.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Prasanna Rajadurai for Mr.S.Muthalraj For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

Mr.S.Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

2.The petitioner seeks for issuance of patta and fix boundary marks of the land situated at Survey Nos.349/1B, 349/2A1, 349/3, 349/1A and Nanja Survey No. 349/5B2 situated in Puthanatham Village, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District.

3. It is seen that the petitioner has made an application earlier on 19.08.2014 only for granting patta and as the said request was not considered, another representation was made by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioner on 12.10.2015 and the said representation is yet to be considered.

4. Perusal of the representations made by the petitioner would show that the petitioner is only seeking for issuance of separate patta and therefore, it is for the third respondent to consider such request and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law. This Court at this stage is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.08.2014 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Per.Admn) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai CM To, 1.The District Collector, Trichy District,Trichy.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sri Rengan Revenue Division, Navalar Kuttapattu, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk,Trichy District.

+1 cc to Mr.Na.Palaniyandi,Advocate, SR No.68846 +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR No.69067 W.P(MD)No.21445 of 2015 02.12.2015 RG.SK-SKN 14.12.2015 2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/