A.C.Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.8478 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/09/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). No.8478 of 2020 A.C.Murugan ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

Crime No. 16 of 2020.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.16 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as Accused No.2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 468, 471, 420 and 120(B) of I.P.C., in Crime No.16 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was working as a Secretary in the Valandur Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, and said to have misappropriated a sum of Rs.96,00,000/-. Thereafter, a proceedings under Section 87 of the Co-operative Societies Act, has been initiated and the property of the petitioner and other accused were attached. Thereafter, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.8478 of 2020 petitioner and other accused said to have created a forged document as if the attachment has been raised and made encumbrance. Hence, the crime was registered.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, on instruction submitted that the petitioner had created a focus order and also made number of encumbrance in the property. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is the master mind and he has created forged documents as if the attachment has been raised, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Hence, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. sd/- 01/09/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8478 of 2020 Date :01/09/2020 sji AE/VR/SAR-II (03.09.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2