Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6961/2016disposed of

S.Thirumalai Kumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-21Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6961 of 2016 S.Thirumalai Kumar .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Station, Trichy District.

(Crime No.03 of 2013) .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent No.1 to supervise and monitor the investigation in Crime No.03 of 2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent and file a final report before the jurisdiction Magistrate within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the first respondent to supervise and monitor the investigation in Crime No.3 of 2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent and file a final report before the jurisdiction Magistrate within a stipulated time.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the complaint has been pending for three years from the date of registration of the complaint, the second respondent Police did not take any action to complete the investigation and to file a final report. Hence, the petitioner has come up with this petition for the aforesaid prayer.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents produced a status report, in which the second respondent stated that even though the suicide note did not implicate anybody as accused, the second respondent has sent the Camera, CD and Cell phone used by the deceased for expert opinion. The learned Government Advocate on instructions would submit that the second respondent Police would file a final report as early as possible.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the sensitivity involved in this case, the first respondent is directed to supervise the investigation to be conducted by the second respondent and to see that the final report to be filed by the second respondent as early as possible.

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Station, Trichy District.

3.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Advocate Sr.NO.31916 sm:SKS-RR:11.07.2016:2P/5C Crl.O.P(MD)No.6961 of 2016 21.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/