Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6969/2016granted

Chinnasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-04-26Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD)Nos.6969, 7010 and 7064 of 2016 1 CHINNASAMY 2 PITCHAIKALAI 3 RAJENDRAN 4 SINGARAJ 5 MAHARAJAN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 5 & 7 to 10 IN CRL.OP(MD)No.6969/2016 PRASANTH ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4 IN CRL.OP(MD)No.7010/2016 VINOTH ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.6 IN CRL.OP(MD)No.7064/2016 N.MURUGABALAN ..INTERVENOR IN CRL.MP(MD)Nos.3649,3650 & 3610/2016 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAMEDU POLICE STATION, PALAMEDU, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.26 OF 2016 RESPECTIVELY) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS For Petitioner : M/S R.SHANKAR GANESH Advocate in all the petitions For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) in all the petitions For Intervenor : Mr.R.SARAVANAN, Advocate in all the petitions PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who arrayed as accused Nos.4 to 10, were arrested by the respondent police on 18.02.2016 and 19.02.2016 respectively, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 302 of IPC, in Crime No.26 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and prays for bail in favour of the petitioner. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that investigation has already been over and only awaiting for chemical analysis report.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that one of the accused, who already granted bail, threatened the defacto complainant and prays for dismissal of the bail.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody for more than 60 days, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 26/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAMEDU POLICE STATION, PALAMEDU, MADURAI DISTRICT.

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 6 THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, BORSTAL SCHOOL, PUDUKOTTAI. +3. CC to M/S R.SHANKAR GANESH Advocate SR.No.23682, 23681 & 23680 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)Nos.6969,7010 & 7064 of 2016 Date :26/04/2016 PBK/JGB-DP/SAR-I 26/04/2016 ::2P-10C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/