Selvaraj v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.04.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN WA (MD) No.205 and 206 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2108 and 2109 of 2015 Selvaraj ... Appellant in W.A.(MD)No.205/17 P.Gopal ... Appellant in W.A.(MD)No.206/17
Versus
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti Division,
2. The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk,
3. The District Registrar, Thoothukudi District,
4. The Sub Registrar Ottapidaram, ... Respondents in both appeals Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 19.12.2016 passed in W.P.(MD) Nos.23977 and 23978 of 2016 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 23977/ 2016 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pursuant to the impugned order of the 4th respondent 13.10.2016, in his proceedings bearing A.Thi.Mu.No.192/2016 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents herein to register sale deed executed for the petitioner dated 07.09.2016 in respect of land in S.No.517/3 Panchalagkurichi Village, Ottapidaram Taluk,
Prayer in WP(MD). 23978/ 2016 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pursuant to the impugned order of the 4th respondent 13.10.2016 in his proceedings bearing A.Thi.Mu.No.191/2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to register sale deed executed for the petitioner dated 07.09.2016 in respect of land in S.No.517/2 Panchalagkurichi Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District. For Appellants : Mrs.Lakshmi Gopinathan For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganantham, A.G.P.
JUDGMENT
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the writ appeals and approach the authority by way of appropriate representation.
2.The prayer sought for is not seriously objected by the learned Additional Government Pleader.
3.Accordingly, the writ appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the appellants to approach the authorities by way of representations, which shall be considered in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti Division,
2. The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk,
3. The District Registrar, Thoothukudi District,
4. The Sub Registrar Ottapidaram, + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 50318 + 1 CC TO M/s.POLAX LEGAL SOLUTIONS, IN SR No. 19181 ARUL TE/MR/SAR-IV : 17/04/2017 : 2P/7C Judgment in WA (MD) No.205 and 206 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2108 and 2109 of 2015 Dated:04.04.2017