The State Of Tamil Nadu v. The Secretary

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN Review Aplw (MD) No.23 of 2017 Ajeet Kumar Saxena ... Review Petitioner/3rd Party vs.

1. M.Ramesh Advocate, 85, Law Chamber, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Uthangudi, Madurai 625 107.

2. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Rep. by its Director, Plot No.5-B, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003. ... Respondents Review Application has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C, against the order passed in WP (MD) No.21214 of 2016 dated 24.11.2016. PRAYER IN WP(MD)No.21214 of 2016:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 28.10.2016 seeking to ensure the benefit of Public and Welfare of innocent girl children from being exploited by false claims, and after due investigation into the financial transactions of Sharanagath trust, take such appropriate legal actions to uphold rule of law and prevent abuse of official position.

For Review Petitioner : Mr.S.Subbiah, Senior Counsel for M/s.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvakumar for R1 Mr.Nagendran for Special Public Prosecutor CBI for R2

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ This Review Application has been filed seeking for review of the order dated 24.11.2016 passed in WP (MD) No.21214 of 2016 before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

2. This Review Petition has been filed by the third party against whom the Division Bench had directed an enquiry to be conducted by the Central Bureau of Investigation. The grievance of the review petitioner is that he was not heard, before this Court directed investigation by the CBI. He has also produced certain materials, in support of his case. A perusal of the materials produced by him prima facie show that the Writ Petition seeking CBI Enquiry against him should be heard, after notice to him.

3. We are therefore of the view that the Review Petition should be allowed and the Writ Petition should be re-heard. For the foregoing reasons, the Review Petition will stand allowed and the order of the Division Bench dated 24.11.2016 will stand set aside.

4. The Registry is directed to post the Writ Petition in WP (MD) No.21214 of 2017 tentatively on 13.08.2018 for fixing the date. No costs.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) To The Director Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Plot No.5-B, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003.

+1cc to Mr.P.JESSI JEEVA PRIYA, Advocate, SR.No. 75676 Review Aplw (MD) No.23 of 2017 27.07.2018 JV KK/SKN/SAR-4/10.08.2018/2P-3C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/