M.Balamurugan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.7146 of 2016 M.BALAMURUGAN ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ABIRAMAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.75 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.R.PRITHIVIRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.04.2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 353, 324 and 307 I.P.C. and Section 3 of PPDL Act in Crime No.75 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.
3. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions: (I) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi; (ii) the petitioner shall stay at Madurai and report before the Tallakulam police station daily twice at 10.00 a.m. and 06.00 p.m. till 15.05.2016 and thereafter as and when required for interrogation before the respondent police;
(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
(iv) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
(vi)The Inspector of Police concerned, is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not. sd/- 27/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI.
2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE SUB JAIL,MUTHUKULATHOOR.
4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI.
6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ABIRAMAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S P.R.PRITHIVIRAJ Advocate SR.No.24286.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7146 of 2016 Date :27/04/2016 AM/NGM.SS/SAR-I/27.04.2016/2P/8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/