R.Arunkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Second day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.10888 of 2018 R.ARUNKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CANTONMENT AWPS, TRICHY IN CR NO 10 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.D.PRASANNA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.1, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 406 IPC in Crime No.10 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

4.The marriage between the petitioner and the defacto complainant had taken place only on 04.02.2018. The Specific allegations are only against the petitioner are that he is having https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ illicit affair with another co-accused and also that he had demanded dowry.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 02/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CANTONMENT ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TRICHY 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.PRASANNA Advocate SR.No.11989 TA GJM/PMI/ASVM/6.7.18-2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10888 of 2018 Date :02/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/