Pushparani, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.7236 of 2016 1 PUSHPARANI 2 CHRISTIAN 3 GIRIJAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT CR.NO.3 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S C.KISHORE Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under section 420 of IPC, in Crime No.3 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this court has already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5264 of 2016, dated 28.03.2016 and since, the order copy was made ready only 01.04.2016, the petitioners were not able to appear before the concerned Magistrate on or before 16.04.2016. The learned counsel further contended that the 1st petitioner's daughter has admitted in the hospital for pregnancy and due to which, the first petitioner along with other petitioners took care of her and hence, the petitioners could not complied the condition imposed by this court and now, they are ready to comply with the condition that may be imposed by this court.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.500/- [Rupees Five hundred only] to the Tamil Nadu Legal Services https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Authority, attached to this Bench on or before 03.05.2016 and thereafter, they should appear before the concerned Magistrate on or before 06.05.2016.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 2 and 3 shall report before the respondent police daily at 6.30 p.m. until further orders and the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 29/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGARCOIL.

3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT 5 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, TAMIL NADU LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S C.KISHORE Advocate SR.No.25423 RG.JGB-DP/AR-I 29.04.2016 2P.7C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7236 of 2016 Date :29/04/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/