Seenivasan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/08/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

1. Seenivasan

2. Sankar ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2&3 Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Pasupathipalayam Police Station, Karur District Cr.526 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.S.Gokulraj, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 526 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A2 and A3 herein was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 30.07.2020 for the offences punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C. r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found in illegal possession of six units of river sand.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the above case. He would also submit that A1 in this case was released on anticipatory bail.

1/3

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the State would submit the petitioner along with other accused have illegally transported six units of sand and A1 in this case was released on anticipatory bail.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration the fact that co- accused in this case was released on anticipatory bail by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners by imposing conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five thousand only)each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur. [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 14/08/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KARUR.

2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT.

3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUBJAIL, KUZHITHALAI, KARUR DISTRICT.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPATHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8426 of 2020 Date :14/08/2020 AAV SRS/ VR/ SAR-II/ 14.08.2020/ 3P/6C 3/3