Gopalakrishnan v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Gopalakrishnan ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of the enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl. side) 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court that the second respondent police is harassing him under the guise of an enquiry. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that the respondents police are not harassing the petitioner and he is the history sheeted rowdy, having five previous cases to his credit and due to the election on routine checkup, they have verified the availability of the petitioner and the petitioner was not at all harassed. 3.Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), this criminal original petition is closed. 18.04.2024 NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet: Yes / No.

sji 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

sji 18.04.2024 4/4