M.Kumaran, S/O G.Malaisamy v. The Chairman , Tangedco

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.4294 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2014 M.Kumaran ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Chairman Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Anna Salai, Chennai-2 2.The Chief Engineer - Personnel Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Annasalai, Chennai-2 3.The Superintend Engineer Tamilnadu Electricity Board Madurai Electricity Distribution Circle K.Pudur, Madurai-7 4.The Chief Engineer / Distribution Tamilnadu Electricity Board Madurai Region K.Pudur, Madurai-625 007 ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records from the respondents pertaining to the impugned Selection List of 4000 Nos. of Helper (Trainee) by Direct Recruitment - 2013-2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the Selection List of 4000 Nos. of Helper (Trainee) by Direct Recruitment - 2013-2014.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan For Respondents :

Mr.G.Kasinathadurai

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the process of selection for appointment to the post of Helper (Trainee) had been concluded during the year 2014 and the selected candidates were appointed and they are working as Helpers (Trainees) for the past more than five years.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the process of selection for appointment to the post of Helper (Trainee) was not conducted transparently and the established principles for selection were not scrupulously followed by the respondents.

3. This Court cannot adjudicate these broad grounds at this length of time, in view of the fact that the selected candidates were appointed during the year 2014 and they are working as Helpers (Trainees) for the past more than five years. This apart, the writ petitioner has not neither impleaded the appointed candidates as party respondents nor challenged the appointment orders issued in their favour in the present writ petition.

4. However, The writ petitioner is at liberty to participate in the ensuing recruitments, if any notified by the respondents. In such an event, the case of the writ petitioner is also to be considered along with all other eligible candidates for appointment.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) +1 CC to Mr.S.A.AJMAL KHAN, Advocate SR-73550. +1 CC to Mr.G.KASINATHADURAI, Advocate, SR-73648. W.P.(MD) No.4294 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2014 04.07.2019 CS: 15/07/2019 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/