Senthilkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/05/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH Senthilkumar ... Petitioner/2nd Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Sindhupatti Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.215 of 2021). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Senthil Kumaraiah.J, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.215 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / accused No.2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 392 of I.P.C., in Crime No.215 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard both sides.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the investigation is pending and they have now recovered the mobile phone, which was alleged to have been robbed.

4.Taking into consideration of the recovery, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

1/3

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 06/05/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

2/3

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM.

2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SINDHUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 C.C. TO M/S.J.SENTHIL KUMARAIAH, ADVOCATE S.R.NO.4547, DATED : 10.05.2022.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8640 of 2022 Date :06/05/2022 MSA/CP USK/JM/SAR-IV/10.05.2022/3P/6C 3/3