← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8687/2020dismissed

S.Jai @ Jaikumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-08-24Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.8687 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24/08/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). No.8687 of 2020 S.JAI @ JAIKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 VS STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONMALAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.

CRIME NO.312/2020.

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/s B.Jameel Arasu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.312/2020 in the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as A-1 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under sections 448, 294(b), 353, 392 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.312 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons have trespassed into the TASMAC shop and without paying money they have stolen the bottles and also made life threat to the defacto complainant. Hence, a complaint has been registered.

3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side). https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.8687 of 2020

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit he is an innocent person and he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

5. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side)appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner who is arrayed as A-1 and that the petitioner is a habitual offender and that there are 34 previous cases are pending against the petitioner in similar offence.

6. Taking note of the submission of the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) and considering the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender and 34 previous cases are pending against the petitioner and hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 24/08/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONMALAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8687 of 2020 Date :24/08/2020 KSA JM/AKM/SAR 3/27.08.2020/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2