← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7599/2016granted

Nivetha v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-04-29Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.7599 of 2016 NIVETHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARAIKUDI SOUTH POLICE STATION SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT CRIME NO.109 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.M.LINGESHWARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.3 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.109 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. He further submitted that the co-accused were granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6623 of 2016 on 20.04.2016.

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the investigation is almost over.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that co-accused were granted anticipatory bail by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, without fail. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

6.It is made clear that the petitioner fails to comply with the condition as stipulated above by this Court, the respondent police is directed to move an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail before this Court.

sd/- 29/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

AM TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,KARAIKUDI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KARAIKUDI SOUTH POLICE STATION SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S A.ROBINSON Advocate SR.No.25170 GJM/AAL/MPA/AR-I-3.5.16-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7599 of 2016 Date :29/04/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/