Madras High CourtWA(MD)/923/2017dismissed as infructuous

The Executive Officer v. N. Ananthan

2017-07-19Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.A.(MD)No.923 of 2017 The Executive Officer, Veemanayagi Amman Thirukovil, Aadhanur, Peravurani Taluk, Thanjavur District.

: Appellant Vs.

1.N.Ananthan 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District.

4.The Tahsildar, Peravurani Taluk, Thanjavur District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Peravurani Police Station, Thanjavur District.

6.S.M.A.Arthar : Respondents PRAYER : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, praying to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.9069 of 2017 dated 25.05.2017, by allowing the present writ appeal.

Prayer in WP(MD). 9069/ 2017 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the respondents 1 to 5 to ensure that the petitioner and devotees of Arulmighu Veemanayagi Thirukovil, Aadhanur conduct the Vaikasi Vishagam festival for the temple commencing from 28.05.2017 till 07.06.2017 without interference of the 6th respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Appellant : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent No.1 : Mr.N.Balakrishnan

JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] Admittedly, the period mentioned in the order passed by the learned Single Judge is over. Thus, the Writ Appeal has become infructuous and it appears that the copy of the order has been served on the appellant belatedly. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that if, in the ensuing order any request is made by the appellant, the same may be considered. 2.Accordingly, liberty is granted to the respondent / writ petitioner, to make a fresh application in advance for the next Vaikasi Vishagam festival. As and when such representation is made, the appellant shall consider the representation, within a period of one week. On similar lines, it is open to the writ petitioner to make such other representations seeking permission to conduct the festival on any other occasion, in which case, the observation made by this Court on Vaikasi Vishagam festival, will also be applicable.

3.Accordingly, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District.

3.The Tahsildar, Peravurani Taluk, Thanjavur District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Peravurani Police Station, Thanjavur District.

+1cc to M/S.A.Saravanan, Advocate SR.No. 66311 JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)No.923 of 2017 19.07.2017 MR JM/KP/SAR 2/25.07.2017/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/