Sundarapandian v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.6339 of 2025 1.Sundarapandian 2.Sudalai 3.Easkki 4.Suresh 5.Mayandi 6.Aandi ... Petitioners Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.176 of 2024) 2.Saravanan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.1520 of 2024, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, for the offences under Sections 294(b), 147 and 506(i) of IPC and quash the same. Page No. 1 of 5

For petitioners : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan For Respondents : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.M.Murugan *****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.1520 of 2024, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, for the offences under Sections 294(b), 147 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.176 of 2024 and quash the same.

2. According to the petitioners, based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Cr.No. 176 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 147 and 506(i) of IPC.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.1520 of 2024, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

Page No. 2 of 5

4. Today, the defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defactocomplainant represented that they entered into a compromise and he has no objection in allowing this petition. A compromise memo, dated 07.04.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.1520 of 2024, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, is quashed.

07.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd Page No. 3 of 5

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.6339 of 2025 07.04.2025 Page No. 5 of 5