Saravanan v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/04/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Saravanan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Lalapet Police Station, Karur District.

Cr.No.97 of 2025.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr. S.Muniyandi, Advoate For Respondent : Mr.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.97 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/7

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 02.04.2025 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner / Accused No.2, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent-police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w. 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, in Crime No.97 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 26.03.2025, when the respondent - Police conducted a vehicle check up near Punavasipatti - Lalapettai Road, nearby Punavasipatti Narasingam "A1 Saloon Shop" at that time, Police intercepted the Lorry and on search they found that, driver of the Lorry transporting 3 units of river Sand without permit licence by using a Lorry bearing Reg.No.TN 38 AU 7444 which belongs to the petitioner herein. Hence, the case.

4. Mr.S.Muniyandi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is an innocent person, and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits 2/7

that based on the confession of co-accused, the petitioner herein is arrayed as accused. However, he is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. He therefore prays for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, Mr.S.S.Manoj, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that there are two previous cases pending against the petitioner, which are similar in nature. He further submits that the vehicle along with minerals recovered from A1, who is the driver of the vehicle. He further submits that investigation of the case is still pending and therefore, at this stage, if pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner, he may cause threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and commit the similar offence. Accordingly, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the respondent-Police already seized the vehicle and minerals, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary in this case. The petitioner has permanent residence and deep roots in the society, and 3/7

therefore, there is less possibility for absconding. Considering the same and with a view to give one more opportunity to the petitioner to reform himself, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

(i) The petitioner shall be released on pre-arrest bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, Karur District within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate. (ii) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) in favour of the "District Green Committee, Karur District", without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt / acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, Karur District at the time of executing the surities. (iii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the 4/7

Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity.

(iv) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent - Police daily weekly twice i.e., on every Monday and Friday at 10.00 am until further orders. (v) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

(vi) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (vii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

(viii) The petitioner shall not enter into the defacto complainant's residence or his work place.

5/7

(ix) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the concerned Magistrate.

(x) The petitioner shall not, directly, or indirectly, cause threat to the defacto complainant and tamper with the evidence.

(xi) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court, as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by him as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

sd/- 17/04/2025 / TRUE COPY / /05/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I/ II /III/ IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TRP 6/7

TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, Karur District.

2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur District.

3. District Green Committee, Karur District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Lalapet Police Station, Karur District.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6293 of 2025 Date :17/04/2025 VN/14.05.2025 7P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 7/7