← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6990/2023dismissed

Ambalam v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-04-17Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.6990 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/04/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.6990 of 2023 1.Ambalam 2.Silambarasan 3.Murugan @ Muruganpoosari 4.Senthil @Senthilkumaran ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1,3,4 & 8 Vs State rep., by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Sivagangai District.

(crime No.3 of 2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.3 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A1, A3, A4 & A8, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 406, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of I.P.C. in Crime No.3 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused had created bogus documents and executed sale deeds in respect of the property in S.No.276/4 of Vaniyambadi Village, Sivagangai District. Based upon the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioners and other accused. Hence, the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.6990 of 2023 3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is seen that the property belongs to the defacto complainant's grandfather. After the demise of his grandfather, the first accused had fabricated documents and by impersonating the name of the defacto complainant's grandfather, executed sale deed in favour of A2, who in turn, executed sale deed in favour of A3. The other accused persons were stood as attested witnesses to the said documents. Therefore the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is very much required in this case. This Court had already dismissed the application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners along with A2 & A5.

5.Taking note of the serious allegations made against the petitioners and there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 17/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /04/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

RMK TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DCB POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6990 of 2023 Date :17/04/2023 PKP/CG/SAR-3/27.04.2023/ 2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2