Sekar @ Rajasekar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirty First day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.19547 of 2018 SEKAR @ RAJASEKAR ... PETITIONER / 3rd ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
(IN CRIME NO. 206 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.S.RAMASAMY Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A3, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 323, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.206 of 2018 seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to love affair of the defacto complainant with one Varalakshmi, the petitioner and other accused attacked the defacto complainant by using filthy language and attacked him. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.
sd/- 31/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.S.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.21065 PS/RR/SAR-1/09/11/2018:2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19547 of 2018 Date :31/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/