A.Vadamanickam, v. Director Of School Education,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.07.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD).No.5335 of 2014 A.Vedamanickam :Petitioner vs.

1.Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary Education), Chennai.

2.District Educational Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

3.Correspondent, De Britto Higher Secondary School, Devakottai 630 303, Sivagangai District.

: Respondents Prayer:

Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2, to consider the period from 18.11.2005 to 22.09.2006, as duty period and confer all the consequential benefits to the petitioner.

For Petitioner :Mr.Lakshmi Gopinathan For M/s.Polax Legal Solutions For Respondents :Mr.V.Muruganandam, AGP (R1 and R2) For Respondent-3 :Mr.Issac Mohanlal

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter, dated 7.7.2015, to the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C0) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar MPK To 1.Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary Education), Chennai.

2.District Educational Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

Gcs/27/07/2015/2p/3c W.P.(MD).No.5335 of 2014 09.07.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/