Ranjith v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.8288 of 2016 RANJITH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.P. PATTINAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CR NO. 32 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.N.GOVARDHANAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 294(b),352,387 of IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.32 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant, who is the Fish seller and also abused him in filthy language. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. While purchasing fish, the petitioner bargained. The defacto complainant abused the petitioner in filthy language and developed quarrel with the petitioner. Due to that motive his name has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the investigation of the case in pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 07/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THIRUVADANAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.P. PATTINAM POLICE STATION,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.N.GOVARDHANAN Advocate SR.No.29092

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8288 of 2016 Date :07/06/2016 AA/NGM-MP/SAR-I/10.06.2016/2p-6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/