Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5449/2014dismissed as infructuous

S.Ramesh v. The Regional Deputy Thasildar,

2017-03-07Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 07.03.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P(MD)No.5449 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 S.Ramesh ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Ottapidaram,Tuticorin District.

2.The Village Administrative Officer, Chinthala Kattai Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

3.V.Mahalinga Reddiar ..Respondents.

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order of the first respondent, dated 19.7.2012 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the first respondent to restore the patta No.1370.

For Petitioner :M/s.H.Arumugam For Respondents :Mr.A.Muthukaruppan 1 and 2 Addl.Govt.Pleader.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar

To 1.The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Ottapidaram,Tuticorin District.

2.The Village Administrative Officer, Chinthala Kattai Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

VSN PSM/BS/21.03.2017/2P/3C W.P(MD)No.5449 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 07.03.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/