← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11128/2018dismissed

T.Umamaheswari v. The Superintendent Of Police

2018-07-05Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated:05.07.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNA KUMAR Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11128 of 2018 1.T.Umamaheswari 2.Valarmathi ... Petitioners vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kottaipattinam, Pudukottai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Kottaipattinam, Pudukottai District.

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Jegathapattinam Police Station, Jegathapattinam, Pudukottai District.

5. Ravichandran

6. Thenmozhi .. Respondents PRYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the petitioners' representation dated 02.07.2018.

For Petitioners :Mr.S.Muthukumar For Respondents 1 to 4 :Mr.K.Suyambulingabharathi Government Advocate (Crl. side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioner and their family members under the guise of enquiry, on the basis of the petitioners' representation, dated 02.07.2018.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondents 3 and 4 frequently called the petitioners and their family members and harassed them under the guise of enquiry.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) on instructions, would submit that the petitioners were called only for enquiry on the complaint made by the defacto complainant. He further submitted that after conducting enquiry, the said complaint was closed. Hence, the statement made by the petitioners that they are being harassed at the hands of the respondents 3 and 4 is incorrect and the same is denied.

5. Recording the above said statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(crl side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kottaipattinam, Pudukottai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Kottaipattinam, Pudukottai District.

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Jegathapattinam Police Station, Jegathapattinam, Pudukottai District.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.S.Muthukumar, Advocate Sr.No.71452 PJL VB/RP/SAR3/16.07.2018/2P/7C Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11128 of 2018 05.07.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/