Muthuvel v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Third day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.8400 of 2016 MUTHUVEL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAIYARKOVIL POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CR. NO.232 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S G.PUGALENDHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 353,294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.232 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the de facto complainant used to get a sum of Rs.200/- from the agriculturists for issuing Adangal Certificate, for which the petitioner given a complaint to the District Collector, due to that motive, a false case has been foisted against the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side). 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Sivagangai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 03/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,SIVAGANGAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SIVAGANGAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAIYARKOVIL POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S G.PUGALENDHI Advocate SR.No.27692

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8400 of 2016 Date :03/06/2016 AA/DB/SAR-II/07.06.2016/2p-6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/