Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8403/2016disposed of

Ghanavel v. The Inspector General Ofpolice

2016-11-16Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8403 of 2016 Ghanavel .. Petitioner -Vs1.The Inspector of General of Police Office of the Inspector of General of Police South Zone, Madurai.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

3.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.

4.The Sub-Inspector of Police S.S.Colony Police Station,Madurai City.

5.Thangammal ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere the civil dispute in petitioner purchased property by way of register Sale deed in Document No. 427/2014 in Survey Number 111/1D on the file of the Nagamalai Pudhukottai Village Villacherry Sub-Village Madurai South Taluk Madurai District.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Udhayakumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) R.1 to R.4

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the first and second respondents to direct the third respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 to 4.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent Police frequently called the petitioner to the Police Station and harassed him under the guise of enquiry in respect of a civil dispute.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that petitioner was called only for enquiry in respect of a petition pending against him and not to decide the civil rights of the parties in the Police Station and that the respondent Police did not cause any harassment to the petitioner. However, he gave an undertaking that if at all the presence of the petitioner is required, the respondent would call the petitioner for enquiry only after issuing summons giving specific date, time and place. 5.Recording the above undertaking given by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1.The Inspector of General of Police Office of the Inspector of General of Police South Zone, Madurai.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

3.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.

4.The Sub-Inspector of Police S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8403 of 2016 16.11.2016 SMA/SKS-RR/30.11.2016:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/