← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8424/2016granted

Pandiaraj @ Pandiarajan v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-06-03Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Third day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.8424 of 2016 PANDIARAJ @ PANDIARAJAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MALLANKINARU POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CR. NO.90/2016 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.90 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner illegally transported 4 unit of sand, due to which there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the respondent.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

4. Herd The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that no one has sustained injury.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one has sustained injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 03/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARUPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR NAGER DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MALLANKINARU POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate SR.No.27920 JA/SK-SKN/SAR-I/07.06.2016/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8424 of 2016 Date :03/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/