Karthick v. The State Of Tamilnadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/04/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Karthick ... Petitioner/ Accused No.2 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
Crime No. 146/2025.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Yogeswaran, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS, 2023 PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.146 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 02.04.2025 1/6
under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.
2. The petitioner / Accused No.2 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent-Police for the offences punishable under Section 308(4) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.146 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-Police.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.03.2025 at about 06.30 a.m., near the bridge on Virudhunagar to Sivakasi road, Accused No.1 signalled the defacto complainant to stop his vehicle under the pretext of asking for a lift. When the defacto complainant stopped, Accused No.1 suddenly took out a knife concealed under his shirt and threatened and attempted to snatch money. While Accused No.2 / petitioner herein who was hiding nearby, rushed to the spot, restrained the defacto complainant from escaping and aided Accused No.1. Hence, the complaint.
4. Mr.J.Yogeswaran, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is an innocent person, and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He, however, submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be 2/6
imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
5. Per contra, Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that the petitioner is a history sheeted rowdy in H.S.No.515 of 2023 maintained by the Thiruthangal Police Station, Virudhunagar District. He further submits that there are 28 previous cases pending against the petitioner. He further submits that if pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner, he may cause threat to the defacto complainant. Hence, he vehemently opposes to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for the Investigating Agency in this case. Further, the petitioner has permanent residence and deep roots in the society, and therefore, there is less possibility for absconding, and with a view to give an opportunity to the petitioner to reform himself, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions. (i) The petitioner shall be released on pre-arrest bail in the event of his arrest 3/6
or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sivakasi, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with two sureties, each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sivakasi;
1. The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sivakasi shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity; (iii) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent-Police daily at 09.00 a.m., until further orders;
(iv) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(V) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (vi) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
4/6
(vii) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sivakasi; (viii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence; and (ix) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sivakasi or Trial Court, as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by him as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].
8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.
sd/- 04/04/2025 / TRUE COPY / /05/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS-I/II/III/IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
5/6
TSG TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE II, SIVAKASI.
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPPUTHUR.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUTHANGAL POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6303 of 2025 Date :04/04/2025 PR/13.05 .2025 6P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 6/6