Shanmugasundaram, v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.11185 of 2018 1 SHANMUGASUNDARAM 2 BOOLOGAPANDI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
(CR.NO.199 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.199 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.
3.This Court went through the contents of the First Information Report. It is seen that the second petitioner herein has used aruval and caused cut injuries to the de facto complainant and his family members.
4.Hence, anticipatory bail is denied for the second petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed so far as the second petitioner is concerned.
5.Considering the nature of allegation made against the first petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the first petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the first https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The first petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The first petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.
sd/- 05/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.12216 GNS JAM/09/07/2018/ PMI/GSR / 2P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.11185 of 2018 Date :05/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/