Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/567/2020closed

Muthu v. The Superitendent Of Police

2020-08-31Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram,Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

H.C.P.(MD) No.567 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI H.C.P.(MD) No.567 of 2020 Muthu ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.State represented by the Inspector of Police, Manamadurai Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.Murugan 4.Karuppan ... Respondents PRAYER: The Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the first and second respondents to produce the person or body of the petitioner's son viz., Karuppuselvam, son of Muthu, aged about 22 years before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner :

Mrs.A.Banumathy For Respondents :

Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.] The prayer in the Habeas Corpus Petition is to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the petitioner's son viz., Karuppuselvam, aged about 22 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that his son was missing from 19.06.2020 and the respondents 3 and 4 kidnapped his son and he is in illegal custody.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

H.C.P.(MD) No.567 of 2020

3. The detenu appeared before this Court and stated that due to some misunderstanding, he has gone to Coimbatore, where he is working and he is not in illegal detention under the respondents 3 and 4.

4. In the light of the above statement of the detenu, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) akv Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Manamadurai Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

H.C.P.(MD) No.567 of 2020 31.08.2020 AP(10/09/2020) 2 P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2