Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8012/2021disposed of

A.Mohideen Sathali Nafeesa v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-08-11Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8012 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE : 11.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8012 of 2021 A.Mohideen Sathali Nafeesa ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Oomarchikulam Police Station, Madurai.

3.Ponnammal 4.Kannan 5.Veeraiah 6.P.Kumar ... Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to issue a direction directing the respondents 1 & 2 herein to give adequate police protection to the petitioner for fencing his property and protect the life and limb of the petitioner and his family and initiate action against the respondents 3 to 6 based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 17.03.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.V.M.Jegadeesha For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to direct the the respondents 1 & 2 herein, to give adequate police protection to the petitioner, for fencing his property and protect the life and limb of the petitioner and his family and initiate action against the respondents 3 to 6, based on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 17.03.2021.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, on 13.07.2021, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that based upon the complaint, given by the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken, in CSR.No.68 of 2021. But, the petitioner has not appeared before the Enquiry Officer and so, the petitioner was directed to appear before the Enquiry Officer and co-operate with the enquiry for complete the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8012 of 2021

3. When the matter taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the private respondents namely, the respondents 3 to 6, also appeared before the Enquiry Officer and during the course of enquiry, there was an amicable settlement between the parties. Based upon which, his representation was closed.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that he will get instructions from the Official respondents over the development. Since the petitioner himself make a settlement, nothing survives for consideration or direction in this petition.

5. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of, as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) dss Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Oomarchikulam Police Station, Madurai.

Copy to The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8012 of 2021 11.08.2021 RK (23.08.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2