Saravanakumar v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Saravanakumar

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Police Station, Madurai City.

(Crime No. 52 of 2025 )

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 52 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.02.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC in Crime No. 52 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused were received a sum of Rs.60,20,000/- from the defacto complainant and his wife through online by way of investment. When the defacto complainant wanted to return the same, the petitioner threatened him. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that A1, A5, A6 and A7 were granted anticipatory bail and A2 was arrested and released on bail and 1616 grams of gold jewels were recovered from the petitioner and other accused. He would further submit that he has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.02.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner. 2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that 1616 grams of gold jewels were recovered from the accused and the petitioner has two previous cases. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and considering the facts that A1, A5, A6 and A7 were granted anticipatory bail and A2 was arrested and released on bail and 1616 grams of gold jewels were recovered from the petitioner and other accused and though the petitioner has two previous cases, in all cases the petitioner was granted bail and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 3/6

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Madurai, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Madurai, on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the 4/6

learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 27.03.2026 apd To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Madurai.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Police Station, Madurai City.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J apd

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6155 of 2026 Date : 27.03.2026 6/6