← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8742/2023allowed

Balamurugan v. The Assistant Director Of Survey And Land Records

2023-04-18Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.04.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Office of the District and Land Survey, Madurai District, Madurai.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. A4/3578/2022 dated 03.02.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to sanction the enhancement of the Subsistence Allowance to the petitioner right from the date of expiry of 6 months of Suspension as per the specific provision contained under Rule 53(1) (a)(i) of the Fundamental Rules within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poornachandran For Respondent : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Advocate General 1/5

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner is holding the rank of Sub Inspector of Survey. He was suspended from service on 18.05.2022. The petitioner seeks revision and enhancement of subsistence allowance payable to him from the date of expiry of six months after suspension order was passed. He made a request in this regard. His request was rejected vide order dated 03.02.2023. Challenging the same, the present writ petitioner has been filed. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. He drew my attention to the catena of orders enclosed in the typed set of papers. He placed particular reliance on FR 53(1)(a)(i). He pressed for setting aside the impugned order and granting relief as prayed for. 4.

Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the allegations made against the petitioner are serious and that the enquiry against him has almost concluded and final order is likely to be passed very shortly. He called upon this Court to dismiss the writ petition.

2/5

5.I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record.

6.FR 53(1)(a)(i) reads as follows :

"53(1)(a)(i) The amount of subsistence allowance may be increased by a suitable amount, not exceeding fifty per cent of the subsistence allowance admissible during the period of the first six months, if, in the opinion of the said authority, the period of suspension has been prolonged for reasons to be recorded in writing, not directly attributable to the Government servant;"

A reading of the aforesaid Rule would indicate that if the delinquent official is responsible for non-conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, then subsistence allowance can even be reduced. On the other hand if he is not responsible, obviously it has to be revised and enhanced. A mere look at the sequence of events would show that the petitioner is not at all responsible for the delay in concluding the proceedings. It is true that final order is yet to be passed and criminal case is still pending. The petitioner cannot be blamed for the non-filing of the final report by the Investigation Officer. 3/5

7.I am satisfied that the petitioner has clearly made out a case for revising and enhancing his subsistence allowance from 50% to 75%. The only question that arises for consideration is from which date enhancement has to be made. The petitioner submitted his application only on 25.01.2023. The respondent has not taken note of the relevant fundamental rule. Hence the order impugned in this writ petition is set aside. Therefore, the respondent is directed to revise and pay enhance subsistence allowance payable to the petitioner with effect from 03.02.2023.

8.This writ petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. 18.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA To The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Office of the District and Land Survey, Madurai District, Madurai.

4/5

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

MGA 18.04.2023 5/5