← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22017/2018granted

Chandhira v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-12-18Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.22017 of 2018 1 CHANDHIRA 2 RAJALAKSHMI 3 CHITRA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No. 1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP. BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ILAYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.296/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.S.S.ANNADURAI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 & 506 (ii) of IPC in Cr.No.296 of 2018 seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that during the wordy quarrel arose between the defacto complainant and the petitioners due to the civil dispute, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaitn.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a false case has been foisted against them and they had nothing to do with the alleged offences.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are relatives. 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the facts that the injured person in this case has been discharge from the hospital, this Court inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 18/12/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , ILAYANKUDI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ILAYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to MR.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.23631

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22017 of 2018 Date :18/12/2018 MSI/JC/SAR-I/25.12.2018-3P/6C