← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8614/2016closed

S.Manivel v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-10Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8614 of 2016 S.Manivel .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town Police Station, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register a criminal case against the accused based on the complaint dated 24.04.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.04.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that when the community meeting was held on 24.04.2016 with regard to deficit account submitted by one of the proposed accused, the proposed accused came there and threatened the petitioner and others with dire consequences and also gave life threat to them. As no case was registered on the said complaint, he has come up with this petition.

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSII) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town Police Station, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to M/s.K.Kannan, Advocate, SR.No.29599 gcg RL/5C/2P/SK/SKN/SARIII/21/6/2016 Crl.O.P(MD)No.8614 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 10.06.2016