Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8630/2016disposed of

V.V.Murugadasan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-13Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8630 of 2016 V.V.Murugadasan ..Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, Superintendent of Police Compound, Dindigul District.

..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 22.03.2016 consequently directing the 2nd respondent to investigate and to file a final report within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karuna For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate(Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 22.03.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that while a civil suit is pending in respect of a property between the petitioner and the proposed accused, the proposed accused attempted the sell the property by creating forged documents and threatened the petitioner to withdraw the suit. As there was no case registered on the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, Superintendent of Police Compound, Dindigul District.

3.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.V.Karna, Advocate in SR.29916 Crl.O.P(MD)No.8630 of 2016 13.06.2016 gcg PBK/AAL-MPA/SAR-II 24.06.2016 ::2P-5C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/